Not a listicle. A considered guide from an educator who has used these tools in the real conditions of inclusive classrooms, what they can do, what they can't, and where the genuine value is.
Special education teachers are among the most time-poor professionals I know. The paperwork is relentless, ILPs, support plans, behaviour plans, meeting minutes, goal updates, reports. The planning demands are high, differentiated resources, adapted materials, multiple versions of the same task. And the emotional labour of the work means that the time outside of student hours needs to be used well.
AI tools have genuine potential to give some of that time back. Not by replacing professional judgment, nothing does that, but by handling the parts of the work that are time-intensive without being intellectually interesting. The goal is not to automate special education. It is to free up the educators in it to spend more time on the parts that actually require them.
For drafting ILPs and goal writing
Claude (Anthropic's AI assistant) is the tool I would reach for first here. Used well, it can take your notes about a student's current performance and help you draft SMART goals, suggested strategies, and ILP language in a fraction of the time it would take to write from scratch. The key is specificity in what you give it: 'This student is in Year 4, autistic, reading at approximately Year 2 level, struggles with task initiation but engages well when topics connect to his interest in trains. Help me draft three ILP goals with strategies.'
You will still need to edit. You will still need to apply your professional knowledge. What you won't need to do is stare at a blank document for twenty minutes before you start. That part, the blank-page initiation problem that all educators face when writing about specific children, is where AI earns its keep.
For creating differentiated resources
Diffit is built precisely for this. You paste in a text, a worksheet, or a topic, and it generates levelled versions, typically across three or four reading levels, with comprehension questions appropriate to each level. For a teacher who routinely needs three versions of the same resource, this is the difference between spending a Sunday afternoon on it and spending twenty minutes.
MagicSchool AI takes a similar approach but with a broader range of output types: modified assessments, vocabulary lists, visual schedule text, and scaffolded instruction sequences. For special education contexts specifically, the modified assessment generator is worth exploring, it can take a standard task and produce an adapted version with reduced language complexity, visual supports flagged, and chunked instructions.
“The question is not whether AI can create a better resource than an experienced special education teacher. It cannot. The question is whether it can create a good-enough resource in five minutes instead of forty-five.”
For behaviour support planning
AI tools can be useful in two ways in behaviour support work. First, as a thinking partner when you are trying to understand what a behaviour might be communicating, describe the behaviour, the context, the antecedents, and the consequences, and ask for a structured ABC analysis or a list of possible functions. You'll still need to validate these against your direct observation, but having a structured starting point speeds up the process.
Second, for drafting the documentation: behaviour support plans have a recognisable structure, and AI tools can produce a solid draft framework, proactive strategies, replacement behaviours, response strategies, that you then populate with your specific knowledge of the student. This works best if you feed it your observation notes first, so the output reflects the actual student rather than a generic template.
For parent communication
Writing to parents about their child's difficulties is one of the most emotionally careful pieces of communication in education. The tone matters enormously. AI can be useful here for drafting initial versions of sensitive communications, not to remove your voice, but to give you a starting point that you then personalise. Paste in the key points you need to convey, specify the tone you want (warm but direct, collaborative, not alarming), and use the draft as raw material rather than a finished product.
For professional learning
NotebookLM is excellent for staying across research and policy without being drowned by it. Upload the documents, a new behaviour support framework, a government report on inclusive education, a condition-specific research summary, and then have a conversation with them. Ask it to summarise the key recommendations. Ask it to identify tensions between two documents. Ask it to pull out every mention of transition supports. This is how busy professionals stay informed without spending their planning time reading PDFs.
What AI cannot do
- Know your students, every AI output requires your knowledge of the actual child to be useful
- Replace relationship, the trust between a special education teacher and a student is built through presence, consistency, and genuine knowing, none of which AI can replicate
- Navigate the emotional complexity of a parent meeting, the judgment, the empathy, the reading of the room
- Notice what the data isn't telling you, experienced special educators see things in the gaps that no algorithm will find
- Be accountable, AI tools do not sign their name to ILPs or take responsibility for the outcomes of their suggestions
A note on privacy
Before using any AI tool with information about students, know your school's privacy policy and the tool's data handling practices. As a general principle: use pseudonyms or remove identifying information where possible, avoid entering anything you would not want stored on an external server, and follow your employer's guidance on AI tool use. The tools described here have varying levels of data privacy, check before you type a student's name.
Used thoughtfully, within clear boundaries, AI tools can return real time to special education professionals. Time that can be spent on the work that only humans can do: being present with students who need them, building the relationships that make the work possible, and exercising the professional judgment that no tool can replicate.
A note on accuracy:While every effort has been made to ensure the information in this article is accurate at the time of writing, facts, policies and research can change. We're human, and sometimes we get things wrong. If you spot something that needs updating, we'd genuinely love to hear from you.
Newsletter
Worth reading. Not often.
Practical guides on neurodiversity, NDIS navigation, and Australian schools. Sent when there's something worth saying, not on a schedule for the sake of it.
No spam. Unsubscribe any time.

Dave Harrison
ESW · Neurodiversity Advocate · Podcast Host
Dave Harrison is currently working in Australian schools as an Education Support Worker. He's the founder of THRVHUB, host of the Different Is Normal podcast, and a parent of a neurodivergent teenager, writing from both sides of the classroom.
More about DaveMore to read
Comments
Sign in with GitHub to leave a comment. All comments are moderated through GitHub Discussions: respectful and on-topic only.